|
Advert
New Bill Threatens Parental Rights: UK Government Seeks Sweeping Powers Over Home Education
Homeschooling parents will be required to demonstrate to their local authorities that their children are receiving a “suitable education,” which remains undefined. Under the proposed bill, local authorities will be invested with the discretion to assess the home environment and even the content and approach of the educational materials used – literally, they would be given power of “life or death” over families. They can declare that a home is too messy, too religious, etc, or that the textbooks the parents choose to use are inadequate. Families could find themselves unfairly judged based on personal, cultural, or religious values which veer from the agenda of the “powers that be.”
The Childrens Wellbeing and Schools Bill is simply an underhanded way of ensuring that children will receive all the horrific education about “alternative lifestyles” and more, which their parents are trying to protect them from – and that the government is aggressively seeking to indoctrinate every child with.
Meanwhile, the independent schools in the UK were already mandated to teach all the terrible things that government schools do, such as material on “alternative lifestyles,” but until now, some have been managing to largely fly under the radar. Once the government, G-d forbid, eliminates the homeschooling option, it is clear that independent schools will be next in line for increased regulation and enforcement. Once they crack down on private schools, parents will be left with no choice but to submit to their children’s ruination or to flee the country.
This is not about avoiding education — it is about protecting the role of the parent in shaping a child’s moral, emotional, and intellectual development. It is about ensuring that the education system works with parents, not against them.
Of course, whatever happens in the UK will have a ripple effect everywhere, and the goals of the anti-family globalists are the same for the whole world.
Now is the time to stay informed, speak up, and stand together for moral values, educational freedom, and parental rights.
If passed, this bill will:
❌ Allow government officials to interfere in private education decisions, including home education.
❌ Grant authorities the power to monitor and regulate how parents educate their own children.
❌ Shift control over children’s upbringing from parents to the state, undermining family autonomy.
❌ Open the door to intrusive home inspections and unwarranted oversight of family life.
? This is a direct attack on parental rights.
International law affirms that parents—not the government—should have the primary responsibility over their children’s upbringing and education.
? If we don’t act now, parents will lose control over their children’s education and home life.
More About the Harms that Will Be Caused by the Bill
The following is from the site “Parent Power.” With thanks to Parent Power, also, for reviewing this article.
The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill has not received anything like the degree of public scrutiny it warrants. While the Bill contains some welcome provisions, such as an increased focus on kinship care in the children’s social care system, taken as a whole the Bill represents a radical assertion of the rights of the State over those of parents, under the pretext of safeguarding vulnerable children. If the Bill passes, local authorities, and not parents, will decide whether home education is in the best interests of children.
The responsibility of parents for the education of their children, and the attendant rights of parents to make choices about their children’s education, have long been recognized in UK law. This principle is presently enshrined in Section 9 of the Education Act 1996. Sections 24-26 of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill undermine the legal embodiment of this principle, and so undermine the parent-child relationship. (Update: the Sections refered to as “24-26” were in the Bill as originally published, but now as the Bill currently stands as it left the Commons, they are actually Sections 30-35.)
Section 24 makes it illegal for the parents of children in special schools, or even simply with an EHC (Education and Health Care) plan in place, to withdraw their children from school without the consent of the local authority. This provision ensures that the decision about whether or not withdrawal from school is in the child’s best interests is made by the local authority, and not the parents. In this case the state, and not the parents, will decide what is best for the child, and parents will be forced to comply with its decisions.
Section 24 also prevents parents under investigation by social services from withdrawing their child from school without the permission of the local authority. Parents may attract the attention of social services for a range of reasons, including malicious referrals from ex-partners or estranged family members, or school staff who disagree with a family’s religious beliefs. There is no evidential threshold for an investigation by social services, with only a tiny proportion of investigations resulting in any further action. This means that any sufficiently motivated person who disagrees with a parent’s decision to withdraw a child from school could force the decision out of the parent’s hands by making a malicious referral to social services.
Section 25 introduces a compulsory register for children not in school, requiring parents to register as home educators, and provide the local authority with details of every individual their children receive education from during the week. Parents even have to declare how many hours each week they spend teaching their children. Under current law, local authorities already have a duty to ensure that children receive a ‘suitable and efficient’ education, and many maintain registers of home educated children — albeit parents are not mandated to register their information. In addition to being burdensome on both local authorities and parents, section 25 ensures that UK law reflects and perpetuates the Government’s view that parents cannot be trusted to keep their children safe.
Section 26 introduces a new system for administering ‘school attendance orders’ (SAOs). Local authorities will be able to issue a ‘Preliminary SAO’ for any of the following reasons: a) the local authority decides that a child is not receiving a suitable education, b) there is any social services involvement (including an initial investigation), c) the local authority decides that it is in the child’s best interests to be in school, and d) the parent has not provided timely or sufficient information to the local authority.
The local authority is then empowered by Section 26 to issue a ‘School Attendance Order’, where conditions a, c, or d are cited, if the local authority judges that the parents have failed to show that they are providing a suitable education. Where condition b is cited, the local authority can issue a SAO if they deem it to be in the child’s best interests. Additionally, the local authority will be able to issue a SAO if ‘in the opinion of the authority it is expedient that the child should attend school.’ The implications of these provisions are painfully clear – it is local authorities, and not parents, who have the legal right to decide whether a child can be home educated or not.
In addition, under Section 26, parents served with a Preliminary SAO must comply with a home visit to inspect their premises and interview their children. Refusal to comply with an inspection may result in an SAO being issued. The premises must be ‘suitable’, a term which is left undefined. Might a home be deemed unsuitable if it is too small, too messy, or even too religious? Section 26 gives the Local Authority the right to force parents to send their children to school under a virtually unlimited variety of pretexts.
While the spin from the Government is that only extremely vulnerable or abused children will be forced into school, the legal right of parents to home educate their children will effectively no longer exist if the Bill passes in its current form. The state, and not parents, will have the right to decide what is best for children.
Regrettably, much of the discussion about the Bill focusses on what the Bill is for, and not what it actually does. The Government claims that the Bill is for safeguarding vulnerable children, but what it does is strip parents of the right to make basic decisions about their child’s education and claim those rights for the state.
|
schools-bill-extracts.pdf
hershele.docx
