State Can Mandate School Attendance to Promote Knowledge and Integration

Hand-Delivered Constitutional Appeal

Dear Readers,

We write to you with deep urgency to share the truth about a clear and present threat to Torah chinuch in the UK..The Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill is a carefully crafted piece of legislation designed to draw every faith-based educational setting—yeshivas, schools, home education—into an irreversible trap .And behind these changes lies something even more chilling: an unspoken aim to create one uniform education system in which every child, from every community, is expected to absorb the same full national curriculum—regardless of background or belief.

This is not inclusion. This is cultural erasure—a soft but systematic effort to strip away the unique identity of every minority in the name of “integration.”

Will Jewish children be taught Torah by dedicated mechanchim, or by government-approved administrators selected for their secular credentials? Will the sacred values of Klal Yisroel be preserved, or steadily replaced by the ideologies of “21st century Britain”? This is not a matter of speculation. These intentions are explicitly outlined in government literature.

What Must Be Done – And Now

All adults (18+) are urged to sign the declaration – CLICK HERE

Text “OK” to 07463 066 613 to sign via SMS
Share this message with family, friends, neighbours, and community members
Encourage rabbonim and askonim to read the government documentation themselves—it is shocking, and it makes the urgency unmistakable
All adults (18+) are urged to sign the declaration –
and Contribute ideas, feedback, or offers to help by emailing: [email protected]

As 835 Letters Land in Westminster, a Rare Civic Appeal Urges the Lords to Uphold Their Constitutional Duty and Resist Legislative Overreach
Today in Westminster, a striking and symbolic act of democratic engagement took place.
835 individually addressed letters were hand-delivered to members of the House of Lords through a grassroots initiative spearheaded by the President of the British Rabbinical Union.
The letter contends that Clause 36 and related provisions will enable local authorities to impose ideologically defined standards on what constitutes “suitable” education, with vague terms open to political manipulation. It flags specific dangers:
The legal community appears to agree. The letter references opinions from leading KCs—including Mark Hill, David Wolfe, and Aidan O’Neill—who describe the Bill respectively as a breach of human rights, a gross invasion of parental authority, and “state surveillance of family life on an unprecedented scale.”
The campaign has been precisely timed: as parliamentary momentum builds, more than two dozen Lords—including senior Conservatives, bishops, and crossbenchers—have already raised constitutional objections, challenging both the content of the Bill and its sweeping ‘Henry VIII powers.’ Lord Baker has warned that the Bill represents ‘a major change of power in this country.’

This is the wording from the Government Schools Bill, 151

The child’s right to an education takes priority over respect for parental religious and philosophical convictions if the two are incompatible.

The child’s right to an education takes priority over respect for parental religious and philosophical convictions if the two are incompatible

The state can insist on compulsory education, in school, and that the aims of ensuring acquisition of knowledge and of integrating minorities into society are legitimate justification for insisting on this and are within a country’s own ‘margin of appreciation’.